NATIONAL LABOR REL. BOARD v. NILES FIRE BRICK, 128 F.2d 258 (6th Cir. 1942)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. NILES FIRE BRICK CO.

No. 9097.Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 11, 1942.

Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against the Niles Fire Brick Company.

Order enforced.

Max Johnstone, of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Joseph B. Robison, Dominick Manoli, and Max Johnstone, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner.

Paul Z. Hodge, of Warren, Ohio (Paul Z. Hodge and George W. Secrest, both of Warren, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent.

Before HICKS, ALLEN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order against The Niles Fire Brick Company, respondent, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, U.S.C.Supp. V., Title 29, Sec. 151, et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. ยง 151 et seq.

The issue of jurisdiction was raised, but that question was decided affirmatively by this court in National Labor Relations Board v. Niles Fire Brick Co., 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 366.

We conclude that the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence. National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 61 S.Ct. 358, 85 L.Ed. 368. We think that, having arrived at this conclusion nothing helpful will be achieved by a detailed discussion of the findings. We are content therefore to follow the practice in Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 312 U.S. 660, 61 S.Ct. 736, 85 L.Ed. 1108, and National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance Mach. Co., 62 S.Ct. 608, 86 L.Ed. ___, decided by the Supreme Court February 16, 1942, wherein the order of the Court of Appeals, 7 Cir., 116 F.2d 350, was reversed by a per curiam opinion with directions to enforce the order of the Board. See also National Labor Relations Board v. Swift Co., et al., 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 30, decided by this court on April 11, 1942.

An order of enforcement will be entered here.

Page 259

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 128 F.2d 258

Recent Posts

BIESTEK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, No. 17-1459 (6th Cir. 1/29/2018)

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS…

8 years ago

SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, No. 17-5809 (6th Cir. 1/26/2018)

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS…

8 years ago

MITCHELL v. CODY, 783 F.2d 669 (6th Cir. 1986)

RICKEY E. MITCHELL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. W.J. MICHAEL CODY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE,…

9 years ago

GENTSCH v. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER CO., 151 F.2d 997 (6th Cir. 1945)

GENTSCH v. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER CO. et al. No. 10003.Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.…

9 years ago

SPIES v. VOINOVICH, 173 F.3d 398 (6th Cir. 1999)

DOUGLAS SPIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, ET AL. DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. No. 97-4175United States Court of…

9 years ago

KOUBRITI v. CONVERTINO, 593 F.3d 459 (6th Cir. 2010)

Karim KOUBRITI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard CONVERTINO, Defendant-Appellant, Michael Thomas, Defendant. No. 09-1016.United States Court of…

9 years ago