NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD. v. ARGO STEEL CONSTR., 289 F.2d 491 (6th Cir. 1961)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ARGO STEEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Local 25, International Association of Bridge Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, AFL-CIO, Respondents.

No. 14044.United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 9, 1961.

On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Rosanna A. Blake, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner.

A.L. Zwerdling, Detroit, Mich., and John W. Babcock, Detroit, Mich., Zwerdling Zwerdling, by George M. Maurer, Jr., Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondents.

Before CECIL, WEICK and O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Consideration and determination of this case were deferred by the Court to await the outcome of cases pending in the Supreme Court which involved somewhat similar issues. These cases have now been decided.[1]

In our judgment, the order of the Board is supported by substantial evidence and should be enforced by this Court except as to the provisions herein enumerated which should be stricken therefrom.

The provisions which must be stricken from the order of the Board are:

(1) Paragraph (1) of the affirmative action order issued against Argo Steel Construction Company reading as follows: Jointly and severally with Respondent Union, reimburse all employees for monies illegally exacted from them in the manner and to the extent set forth in the section of this Decision and Order entitled “The Remedy.”

(2) Paragraph (1) of the affirmative action order issued against the Union reading as follows: Jointly and severally with Respondent company reimburse all employees of Respondent company for monies illegally exacted from them in the manner and to the extent set forth in the section of this Decision and Order entitled “The Remedy.”

(3) Preserve and make available to the Board or its agents upon request, for examination and copying, all membership, dues, permit and other records necessary to compute the monies illegally exacted from employees of Respondent Company.

An order may be entered enforcing the order of the Board as modified herein.

[1] Local 60, United Brotherhood of Carpenters Joiners of America, AFL-CIO et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, 81 S.Ct. 875; National Labor Relations Board v. News Syndicate Company, 81 S.Ct. 849; International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, 81 S.Ct. 855.

Page 492

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 289 F.2d 491

Recent Posts

BIESTEK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, No. 17-1459 (6th Cir. 1/29/2018)

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS…

8 years ago

SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, No. 17-5809 (6th Cir. 1/26/2018)

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS…

8 years ago

MITCHELL v. CODY, 783 F.2d 669 (6th Cir. 1986)

RICKEY E. MITCHELL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. W.J. MICHAEL CODY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE,…

9 years ago

GENTSCH v. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER CO., 151 F.2d 997 (6th Cir. 1945)

GENTSCH v. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER CO. et al. No. 10003.Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.…

9 years ago

SPIES v. VOINOVICH, 173 F.3d 398 (6th Cir. 1999)

DOUGLAS SPIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, ET AL. DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. No. 97-4175United States Court of…

9 years ago

KOUBRITI v. CONVERTINO, 593 F.3d 459 (6th Cir. 2010)

Karim KOUBRITI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard CONVERTINO, Defendant-Appellant, Michael Thomas, Defendant. No. 09-1016.United States Court of…

9 years ago