MATLOCK TRUCK BODY AND TRAILER CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT.

No. 71-1559.United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
February 25, 1972.

John T. Conners, Jr., Nashville, Tenn., for petitioner on brief.

Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Abigail Cooley Baskir, Arthur L. Fox II, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent on brief.

Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

[1] ON PETITION TO REVIEW AND CROSS-PETITION TO ENFORCE AN ORDER OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and KEITH,[*]
District Judge.

[*] Honorable Damon J. Keith, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

[2] On consideration of a petition to review and set aside certain findings and orders of the National Labor Relations Board, see 191 N.L.R.B. No. 91 (1971), and a cross-petition to enforce said orders filed by the Board; and after full consideration of the briefs and the appendix filed in this proceeding, and finding substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole for affirmance of the Board’s finding that petitioner had violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1) (1970), by coercive interrogations and threats, and that there is substantial evidence on the whole record that petitioner also violated § 8(a)(1)(3) and (4) of the Act by discharging three employees because of their protected concerted activities.

[3] The orders of the National Labor Relations Board are enforced.

Page 1230

Tagged: