No. 82-3155.United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.Argued December 6, 1982.
Decided January 17, 1983.
Page 164
Richard Austin, Austin, Jones, Littlejohn Owens, Dayton, Ohio, Louis Lucas (argued), Picard, Canale, Caywood, Lucas
Watson, William E. Caldwell, Ratner Sugarmon, Memphis, Tenn., Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr., Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff-appellant.
David C. Greer, Leo F. Krebs (argued), Bieser, Greer Landis, Armistead W. Gilliam Jr., Smith Schnacke, Dayton, Ohio, Thomas I. Atkins, N.A.A.C.P. Sp. Contribution Fund, Brooklyn Heights, N Y, for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
Before LIVELY, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS and PECK, Senior Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
[1] This appeal involves attorney fees and costs allowed by the district court for five attorneys in this protracted school desegregation case. The district court allowed a total of $383,540.25 in attorney fees and $48,868.57 for reimbursement of costs and expenses, all to be paid by the defendants. Four attorneys and the personal representative of the fifth attorney, now deceased, challenge the allowances as inadequate and claim $1,210,291.50 as reasonable attorney fees and $49,569.46 for out of pocket expenses. [2] The reported decisions in this protracted litigation are as follows: Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526, 99 S.Ct. 2971, 61 L.Ed.2d 720 (1979); Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406, 97 S.Ct. 2766, 53 L.Ed.2d 851 (1977) Brinkman v. Gilligan, 583 F.2d 243 (6th Cir. 1978) (Brinkman IV), aff’d Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526, 99 S.Ct. 2971, 61 L.Ed.2d 720 (1979); Brinkman v. Gilligan, 539 F.2d 1084 (6th Cir. 1976) (Brinkman III) vacated and remanded sub nom., Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406, 97 S.Ct. 2766, 53 L.Ed.2d 851 (1977) Brinkman v. Gilligan, 518 F.2d 853 (6th Cir.) (Brinkman II) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1000, 96 S.Ct. 433, 46 L.Ed.2d 3761. Louis Lucas $100,093.50
2. William Caldwell $107,073.75
3. Richard Austin $30,540.00
4. Paul Diamond $144,333.00
5. Estate of Maynard Dickerson $1,500.00
[4] The fees and expenses are documented and analyzed in detail by the district judge in his comprehensive opinion, based upon the evidence in the record. Reference is made to the opinion of the district judge for a detailed recitation of pertinent facts Brinkman v. Gilligan, Civil No. C-3-75-304 (S.D.Ohio, Jan. 22, 1982). [5] Upon consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel and the entire record, the court concludes that the findings of fact of the district court are not clearly erroneous, Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), and are supported by substantial evidence. The attorneys contend that the district court abused its discretion by failing to follow the guidelines laid down by this court in Northcross v. Board of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir. 1979) cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911, 100 S.Ct. 3000, 64 L.Ed.2d 862Page 165
[6] Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is affirmed. No costs are taxed. The parties will bear their own costs in this court.Page 704
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS…
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS…
RICKEY E. MITCHELL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. W.J. MICHAEL CODY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE,…
GENTSCH v. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER CO. et al. No. 10003.Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.…
DOUGLAS SPIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, ET AL. DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. No. 97-4175United States Court of…
Karim KOUBRITI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard CONVERTINO, Defendant-Appellant, Michael Thomas, Defendant. No. 09-1016.United States Court of…